ABSTRACT
Although the most common clinical findings of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) are fever, cough and difficulty in breathing, there are also findings related to other systems and organ involvement. There are increasing reports of dermatological symptoms. The timing of skin symptoms varies in COVID-19 cases. Maculopapular rash, which is one of the common dermatological symptoms, may be associated with COVID-19 or may be seen in different clinical conditions such as drug reactions. This situation when evaluated together with the variations in the timing of findings, causes difficulties in differential diagnosis. In this report, two cases who were followed up with the diagnosis of COVID-19 and applied with symptoms of widespread maculopapular rash following the clinical recovery period are presented. © 2022, Pamukkale University. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The utility of hydroxychloroquine for the prophylaxis and treatment of alarmingly rising COVID-19 infection has been widely explored in several studies. However, its cutaneous adverse effects among health care workers and COVID patients taking prophylactic doses has not been reported. We report cases of palmoplantar among health care workers who were on prophylactic doses of hydroxychloroquine and their management with cetirizine and methylprednisolone.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Hydroxychloroquine , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Referral and Consultation , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused thousands of deaths since it was declared as a pandemic. Recently it continues to be one of the most followed topics in the world in terms of its course and treatment. Favipiravir is a broad-spectrum anti-viral agent that has been shown to be effective against various Coronaviruses in vitro. However, as with any drug use, side effects may develop with the use of favipravir treatment. Case Report: We reported a 55-year-old female patient with acute urticarial with angioedema whom had COVID-19 pneumonia. She had no history of allergy, atopy, previous similar episodes or family history of hereditary angioedema. There is no drug or food consumption that may be suspicious in terms of allergy described by the patient other than favipravir. Conclusion(s): As far as we know, it is the first case reported from our country. Since there is no specific examination for differential diagnosis, we cannot distinguish as a rare side effect due to favipiravir treatment or COVID-19 cutaneous manifestation. As a result, studies involving more cases of COVID-19 skin findings are needed.© Copyright 2020 by Emergency Physicians Association of Turkey.
ABSTRACT
Background: In December 2019, a new infection termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was recognised in Wuhan China. In literature only few studies exist on cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 phase. Hence the present study is conducted to know the most common cutaneous manifestations. Material(s) and Method(s): The present study included total of 60 patients presented with skin manifestations during COVID-19 and post COVID-19 phase of both in-patients and out-patients from October 2020 to June 2021. The patients aged more than 18yrs, tested positive for SARS CoV2 with dermatological manifestation during the infection and 3wks after testing negative for SARS CoV2 up to 3 months were included. The dermatological manifestations were recorded during the active COVID-19 infection and during post-COVID-19 period. Result(s): Among the 60 patients the common pattern was maculopapular rash in 24 patients (40%), urticaria seen in 8 patients (13.3%), chilblain seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and livedo reticularis seen in 2 patient (3.33%), during post COVID-19 were acneiform eruption seen in 16 patients (26.4%), vesicular lesions seen in 4 patients (6.66%) and lichen plan us observed in 2 patients (3.33%). Conclusion(s): There is significant association of presence of the dermatological manifestations among the patients with COVID-19 and post COVID-19 period. Study of these dermatological manifestations and their pathogenesis and their significance in human health is useful in avoiding misdiagnosis and proper treatment.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Corona Virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented a huge challenge to the health care system in terms of magnitude of cases and to pediatric oncology units with varied clinical presentations. Acute myeloid leukemia(AML) is a rare heterogenous cancer of childhood with an induction mortality around 15% in our country due to neutropenic sepsis. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children(MIS-C) is an hyperinflammatory syndrome seen 4–6 weeks after COVID-19 infection. COVID infection in some of these children would have gone unnoticed. Here we report a two year eight months old boy diagnosed with AML on induction chemotherapy developed post COVID MIS-C. © 2022
ABSTRACT
Concurrent with the administration of vaccines for the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), there have been many reported adverse effects, and many of them anticipated as with any vaccine administration. This case report, however, focuses on a patient who, shortly after receiving the first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, developed a pruritic maculopapular rash with typical distribution and clinical characteristics, along with high levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA), consistent with IgA vasculitis, formerly known as Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Although there are reported cases of IgA vasculitis after different vaccine administrations, to our knowledge, there are no reports of development of this condition after COVID-19 vaccination. The patient did not have any other triggering events or factors that could be attributed to the development of this pathology. This case describes the development of IgA vasculitis after the COVID-19 vaccination. Copyright © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a life-threatening drug-induced condition presenting with skin rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, systemic involvement and hematological (eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes) findings. Although DRESS syndrome is frequently associated with reactivation of herpesviruses, the link between DRESS and COVID-19 has not been systematically analyzed. Method(s): A systematic search using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to identify all reported DRESS cases associated with COVID-19 published between January 2020 and January 2022 using the keywords "COVID-19" AND "DRESS syndrome" OR "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" OR "drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome" OR "eosinophilia" AND "SARS-CoV- 2" OR "coronavirus". The identified DRESS cases were evaluated using the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) scoring system [Kardaun et al, 2007]. Result(s): We identified twelve published DRESS cases associated with COVID-19 (Table 1). Eleven patients presented with severe COVID-19 disease complicated by DRESS syndrome that developed several days after initial COVID-19 clinical presentation (ARDS n5;multiorgan failure n1;pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation, n4), one patient was asymptomatic. The culprit drugs included piperacillin-tazobactam (n4), hydroxychloroquine (n5), vancomycin (n2), ceftriaxone (n1), midazolam (n1), sulphasalazine (n1), azithromycin (n1), esomeprazole (n1), cefepime (n1), levofloxacin (n1), and meropenem (n1). The latency between the onset of treatment with culprit drug(s) and the onset of symptoms ranged from 9 to 42 days. All patients presented with widespread maculopapular rash, affecting > 50% of body surface area;five patients also had facial edema. Systemic involvement included liver (n8), renal abnormalities (n8), and heart involvement (n4). All patients had elevated body temperature (fever > = 38.5degreeC, n6) and blood eosinophilia, five patients had lymphadenopathy. Atypical lymphocytes were a rare laboratory finding (n2). Systemic corticosteroids were used in all patients;three patients received benralizumab for DRESS syndrome. Nine patients recovered, two patients died and the outcome was not reported in one case Conclusion(s): DRESS syndrome in COVID-19 patients is associated with multiple drugs, most notably with hydroxychloroquine and a variety of antibiotics. An early recognition may improve management of DRESS syndrome in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Months after the initial report of an unknown cause of pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China, the SARS-COV-2 continues its rampant spread globally. This novel corona virus has been known to cause severe respiratory illness. It is important to be wary of the complications that would soon present at the Out-patient centers after being cured from the infection. Case: This is a case of a 59-year-old, female who came in at the Out-Patient Clinic with progressive bilateral pins and needles sensation of the feet after recovering from COVID-19 infection followed by a sensory level on T7-T10. Case Report: Here we present a case of transverse myelitis as a complication of COVID-19 infection, the first to have occurred after recovery from the virus. With the success of treatments and recoveries, possible post infectious sequelae could be the next wave that could come into the present picture of the pandemic. Conclusion(s): Post infectious transverse myelitis after recovering from COVID-19 is a possibility and that documentation of such cases and other complications must be reported.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID 19 infection in children is characterized by a clinical polymorphism, cutaneous manifestations being present in a significant percentage. Data reported in the literature described cutaneous manifestations in the form of measles rash, acral lesions, livedo reticularis and racemosa, acute urticaria, non-pruritic papulo-vesicular rash but also multisystemic inflammatory syndrome. Recognition of these lesions may suggest a diagnosis of acute SARS-COV2 infection, and when anamnestically detected, the rash provides evidence of a possible MIS-C in children that may quickly progress unfavorably. In some cases, newborns who belong to mothers affected by the new coronavirus have a temporary maculopapular rash, with a diffuse appearance, which disappears spontaneously but with an impact on the fetus. Method(s): In conducting this retrospective study we used data extracted from 320 medical records of pediatric patients diagnosed with acute SARS-COV 2 infection, in the Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children 'Sf. Maria' Iasi, Romania, between January 2020 -January 2021. Subsequently, the cases with cutaneous manifestations detected at the time of admission but also those present prior to admission and reported by the parents were selected. There were 3 pregnant patients who met the above criteria. Result(s): Cutaneous manifestations were present in 31% of patients. These had a favorable outcome in most cases. There were 7 cases of MIS-C in which the outcome was unfavorable (2 cases) and slowly favorable (5 cases). In these situations, the cutaneous manifestations lasted longer and in most cases, correlated with the severity of the disease. In pediatric pregnant patients, the outcome was favorable and did not have a negative impact on the newborn. Conclusion(s): Cutaneous manifestations are common in children with acute SARS-COV 2 infection and these appear to be represented by the location of the virus in the superficial blood vessels. The appearance of livedo-type lesions has been associated with microthrombotic processes and have been less frequently found but with a slowly favorable outcome. The diagnosis of MIS-C represents an emergency, cutaneous manifestations playing an important role in the early detection and treatment of these children.
ABSTRACT
Case report Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes latent asymptomatic infection in most adults worldwide. Immunodeficiency or immune activation can disrupt viral suppression and lead to viral reactivation, occasionally causing a mononucleosis-like illness in otherwise healthy immunocompetent people. A 37-year- old female presented with a 10-day history of fevers, chills, right-sided neck tenderness, rapidly expanding rash, as well as myalgia, arthralgia, and weakness. She had received her first dose of tozinameran (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine) 11 days prior to symptom onset. She was admitted to hospital for further investigations, and was seen by an allergy/clinical immunology specialist, with the diagnosis initially felt to be a delayed serum sickness-like reaction to the vaccine. On admission to hospital, the patient was febrile (37.8C) and tachycardic (122 beats/min). Her physical examination was remarkable for right-sided submandibular tenderness, diffuse blanchable, nonpruritic, erythematous, maculopapular rash, and mild facial swelling. There were no effused joints, lymphadenopathy, nor splenomegaly. Bloodwork showed pancytopenia and mild liver transaminase elevation. Blood cultures were negative. Multiple PCR tests for COVID-19 were negative. Monospot and serology for HBV, HIV, and B. burgdorferi were negative. CMV serology was positive, but unavailable until after discharge. ANA and rheumatoid factor were negative. CT head demonstrated nonspecific edema in the right submandibular area without abscess. On outpatient follow-up, the patient reported symptom resolution over two months. Repeat CMV titres two months post hospitalisation showed strongly elevated IgG, which upon consultation with infectious diseases was felt to represent CMV reactivation (Table 1). CMV viral load was negative. Pancytopenia resolved and transaminases normalized. She received her second dose of tozinameran 4 months post first dose with prophylactic valacyclovir 1g once daily for 1 week prior to and 1 week post vaccination as recommended by infectious diseases and remained asymptomatic. This case is the first known description of CMV reactivation secondary to COVID-19 vaccination. It may be underdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptomatology, as CMV seropositivity ranges from 60-100% of all adults. While causality has yet to be established, recognition of this condition may allow appropriate treatment and prophylaxis in order to facilitate safe COVID-19 vaccination in affected individuals. The patient has provided verbal consent through the telephone for the publication of this case report due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, with written consent to follow.
ABSTRACT
Case report Introduction: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), is an immune-mediated disease characterized by severe mucocutaneous symptoms and is the result of an inflammatory response that leads to keratinocyte necrosis and perivascular lymphocyte infiltration, mostly drug-related. Case report: A 35-year- old male, with a history of recently diagnosed systemic lupus under treatment with prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate and cotrimoxazole forte evolves with persistent proteinuria, it is decided to add losartan, chlorthalidone and atorvastatin. Nevertheless despite immunosuppression, proteinuria and skin involvement persisted, so mycophenolate was suspended and a bolus of cyclophosphamide 1 g was administered. Eight weeks after adjusting treatment, the patient went to the emergency department due to a confluent, pruritic, maculopapular rash with blistering lesions on the trunk, upper limbs, face, and oral mucosa, associated with fever over 38degreeC, that evolved during one week. On admission, the following was confirmed: confluent erythematous macular exanthem associated with multiple flaccid blisters on the chest, upper limbs and neck, Nikolsky's sign (+), keratoconjunctivitis and dryness on the lips. Admission tests included complete blood count with no leukocytosis or eosinophilia, ESR 29 mm/hr, C-RP 19.8 mg/L, no liver profile abnormalities, creatinine 0.8 mg/dl, and urine test with proteinuria 300 mg/dl. Negative infectious study for mycoplasma, herpes 6 virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein barr virus, hepatitis A, B, C, E and SARS-COV2 virus. Due to severe mucosal skin involvement, TEN/SJS was suspected v/s (TEN)-like Lupus presentation, drugs used prior to admission (chlorthalidone, losartan, atorvastatin) were discontinued, and treatment was started with Hydrocortisone 100 mg every 8 hours IV, Immunoglobulin 2 g/kg daily IV for 4 days, plus skin and mucous membrane care. Patient had a favorable evolution, with resolution of skin and mucosal lesions and no signs of infection. Skin biopsy showed necrotic epidermis, necrotic basal keratinocytes, and sparse lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate in the papillary dermis, consistent with erythema multiforme/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Conclusion(s): Extensive mucosal involvement is one of the cardinal signs of the presentation of SJS/ETN and given its severity, a high index of suspicion is important with the consequent suspension of suspected drugs and support management for a favorable evolution. In this case the suspected culprit drug was the combination of cyclophosphamide and chlorthalidone, due to reports of increased toxicity of cyclophosphamide in combination with diuretic drugs.
ABSTRACT
Case report We present the case of a 63-year- old man with two consecutive admissions, due to COVID19 infection and subsequent bacterial superinfection. Three days after the second admission (04/28), and 43 days from the beginning of the infection an assessment by dermatology and allergology is then requested. The patient had generalized erythematous maculopapular rash in the trunk, back, groin and limbs. On the left side and back, pustular lesions not focused on follicles were also added, with a fever of 37.7degreeC. There were no oral and genital lesions. No psoriasis. The drugs used during the present and previous admissions were reviewed. Previous admission (04/04-22/ 20): Linezolid, ciprofloxacin, meropenem 04/13-22, piperacillin/tazobactam, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ceftriaxone. Upon discharge amoxicillin/acid clavulanic. Present admission (04/25) Cutaneous reaction 04/28. 04/25: meropenem, paracetamol, enoxaparin, insulin, omeprazole, venlafaxine. 04/26: Darbepoetin, furosemide, mycophenolate in single dose. 04/27: Linezolid, macrogol, Clopidogrel, Magnesium, Calcitriol. Medical records: DM type 2, liver transplantation due to HCV cirrhosis, HCV recurrence, uninodular hepatocarcinoma, advanced CKD, secondary hyperparathyroidism, multiple neurological antecedents. We performed a detailed study. We hypothesized with a pharmagological/ drug reaction with several drugs possibly involved and our main suspicion was an allergic reaction to beta-lactams. Biopsy: Subcorneal pustules, basal spongiosis and presence in the superficial dermis of edema and an inflammatory infiltrate with abundant neutrophils. No fungi. Findings compatible with clinical diagnosis of generalized acute exanthematic pustulosis (PEGA). Immunohistochemical study Covid19. (Jimenez Diaz Foundation) Finely granular positivity in endothelium and more coarse in sweaty epithelium. Neutrophilic superficial inflammatory component with presumably spure staining. ACe-2 (positive external control) is not detected. The patient presents a EuroSCAR score of 9, sum of the clinic and the pathological anatomy, and therefore defined diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis: PEGA secondary to meropenem. Conclusion(s): We present the case of a PEGA by meropenem, not very often described in the literature. We highlight the importance of differential diagnosis with viral infections. Skin tests, especially epicutaneous tests, are key to the diagnosis. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
We present a literature review of dermatology features in historical pandemics. A pandemic is an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and affecting a large number of people. Smallpox was the first documented pandemic, around 10 000 BC, spread by the inhalation of airborne droplets. A few days after an initial high fever, headache and fatigue, a mucocutaneous maculopapular eruption appeared, which then developed pustules and erosions. The last outbreak occurred in the USA in 1949. Smallpox was eradicated in 1980, following a vaccination programme. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), an ongoing global pandemic. The earliest documentations were 3300 years ago. In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) provisionally estimated 1.5 million deaths globally. Most commonly affecting the lungs, cutaneous TB may present with inflammatory papules, plaques, suppurative nodules and chronic ulcers. Requiring long, complex antibiotic regimens, multidrug resistant TB is an increasing problem. Now extremely rare, yet still with recent outbreaks in 2021 in Madagascar, bubonic plague arrived in Europe in 1346 causing 75-200 million deaths. It is caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, transmitted through fleas that have fed on infected rodents. Clinical features include papules, pustules, ulcers and eschars, tender lymphadenopathy and systemic symptoms, and it responds to antibiotics. Syphilis, caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum, is sexually transmitted. The first known outbreak was during warfare in 1494-5 in Naples, Italy. In 2020, the WHO estimated that, globally, seven million people had new infections. Primary syphilis typically produces a painless, genital ulcer (or chancre). Secondary syphilis presents with a nonitchy, maculopapular erythema over the trunk, palms and soles. Early recognition and antibiotic treatment usually lead to good outcomes. Estimated by the WHO to affect 37.7 million people in 2020, HIV is thought to have mutated from simian immunodeficiency virus by the 1960s in sub-Saharan Africa, spreading to the Caribbean and USA by the late 1960s. Initial symptoms include a fever, headache and lymphadenopathy. Dermatological features are common, including opportunistic cutaneous infections, nonspecific exanthemas, seborrhoeic dermatitis and Kaposi sarcoma. Advances in antiretroviral therapies mean people with HIV can have an excellent prognosis, although the WHO estimated in 2020 that more than 200 000 people with HIV died from concomitant TB. Since 2019, COVID-19 has had a considerable global impact on healthcare. With more than 300 million cases and 5.5 million deaths to date, some services have been overwhelmed owing to large case numbers, variable vaccine uptake, workplace changes to reduce transmission and staff shortages. Cutaneous features include perniosis, urticarial, purpuric, vesicular or maculopapular eruptions. Pandemics throughout history have been repeatedly shown to present with an element of skin involvement. We can utilize this to promote education and early recognition of these features, to facilitate diagnosis and raise awareness of the potential complications of serious diseases.
ABSTRACT
X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency is a primary immunodeficiency associated with recurrent hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) episodes. The clinical phenotypes of XIAP deficiency vary, ranging from splenomegaly to life-threatening inflammation. We report a case of XIAP deficiency with unusual late-onset HLH presentation likely triggered by a drug allergy. A previously healthy adolescent boy presented to the hospital with fever and rash seven days after starting antibiotics for a neck abscess. Laboratory evaluation demonstrated cytopenias, elevated liver enzymes, and increased inflammatory markers. Initially, antibiotics were discontinued due to concern for drug rash. He continued to deteriorate clinically and became hypotensive. Additional testing revealed decreased NK cell function, as well as elevated ferritin, triglycerides, and soluble IL-2 receptor. SLAM-Associated Protein (SAP) and XIAP evaluation by flow cytometry demonstrated decreased XIAP expression. Subsequently, genetic testing revealed a known pathogenic mutation in BIRC4 (c.421_422del), confirming the diagnosis of XIAP deficiency.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
A 59-year-old man presented with a widespread morbilliform rash after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. He had no significant medical history and no known allergies. He did not take any regular medication. He developed pruritus without rash 4 h after his first vaccine. This resolved after 10 days without intervention. One day after his second dose, he developed an extensive pruritic morbilliform eruption on his trunk and limbs, affecting 35% of his body surface area. with no mucous membrane involvement. The rash persisted for 4 weeks after his second vaccination and he was referred to dermatology. Eosinophils were raised at 0.54 and liver function tests were normal. Antinuclear antibodies and extractable nuclear antigen were negative. Complement levels were normal. Histology showed mild epidermal acanthosis, spongiosis and subcorneal vesicles. Within the superficial to mid-dermis, there was a mixed chronic inflammatory infiltrate comprising lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils and numerous eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence was negative. He received a tapering dose of oral prednisolone with mometasone topically. Despite substantial improvement with this regimen, his rash began to worsen 2 days following discontinuation of oral prednisolone. He was still using daily mometasone on cessation of oral steroids. He was trialled on oral doxycycline for 1 month, which led to a marked improvement in the morbilliform rash. Despite improvement in the rash, the patient reported ongoing intense daily pruritus which was having a marked impact on his quality of life. He has commenced on narrowband ultraviolet B (UVB) phototherapy to treat his persistent pruritis, with good effect to date. Morbilliform eruptions have been reported as a cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19 and as a side-effect of mRNA vaccines. Proposed mechanisms for the development of skin rashes post-mRNA vaccines include viral protein expression following vaccination, prior infection with COVID-19 causing cross-reaction with the mRNA vaccine encoded antigen and vaccine components acting as haptens inducing a T helper 2 inflammatory reaction characterized by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 expression. Drug-induced maculopapular eruptions typically resolve within 7-14 days on withdrawal of the culprit medication. The persistent nature in our patient may imply a complex immune response. The use of phototherapy to treat inflammatory dermatoses and pruritic conditions such as nodular prurigo is well described. The antipruritic effect of phototherapy is thought to work via modulation of both the neural pathways involved in itch and local immune cells in the skin. Our case highlights that phototherapy can be used in the treatment of cutaneous side-effects that arise after COVID-19 vaccines. To the best of our knowledge, this case is one of the first to use narrowband UVB phototherapy to treat a cutaneous side-effect of an mRNA vaccine.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs), also known as toxidermia, are skin manifestations resulting from systemic drug administration and it constituted 10%-30% among all reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). These reactions range from mild morbilliform drug rash to much more severe reactions. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective observational study was conducted at dermatology outpatient department of rural based tertiary care center for a duration of 03 years from August 2019 to July 2022, a total of 211 patients who had been clinically diagnosed or were suspected to have drug reactions were studied. Result(s): In this observation there was male preponderance (59.72%) and majority of patients were in their 3rd and 4th decade (40.28%) with maculopapular drug rash (33.17%) being most common clinical profile of CADRs, followed by urticaria (23.70%). Less frequently seen CADRs were acneiform eruptions (21), hair Loss (9), photodermatitis (9), generalised pruritus (7), erythroderma (2), pityriasis rosea (2), Stevens Johnson Syndrome-Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS-TEN) (4), lichenoid drug eruptions (3), Vasculitis (1) and pustular drug eruption (1). The most common group of drugs causing CADRs were antibiotics (40.28%), followed by NSAIDs (28.43%). Conclusion(s): Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CADRs) are price we pay for the benefits of modern drug therapy;knowledge of these reactions is important for treating physician as prompt recognition and treatment can prove lifesaving.Copyright © 2022 Academic Medicine and Pharmacy
ABSTRACT
The systemic and respiratory clinical manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include fever, coughing, sneezing, sore throat, rhinitis, dyspnea, chest pain, malaise, fatigue, anorexia and headache. Moreover, cutaneous manifestations have been reported in 0.2% to 20.4% of cases. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 leads to a better prognosis; knowledge of its cutaneous manifestations is one way that may help fulfil this goal. In this review, PubMed and Medline were searched with the terms "dermatology", "skin" and "cutaneous", each in combination with "SARS-CoV-2" or "COVID-19". All articles, including original articles, case reports, case series and review articles published from the emergence of the disease to the time of submission, were included. In this comprehensive narrative review, we tried to provide an analysis of the cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19, including maculopapular rash, urticaria, Chilblain-like, vesicular lesions, livedo reticularis and petechiae in asymptomatic/symptomatic COVID-19 patients that might be the first complication of infection after respiratory symptoms. Immune dysregulation, cytokine storms, side effects of antiviral drugs, environmental conditions and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy might be involved in the pathogenesis of the cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, knowledge of cutaneous COVID-19 manifestations might be vital in achieving a quick diagnosis in some COVID-19 patients, which would help control the pandemic. Further research is very much warranted to clarify this issue.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To report a case of a 51-year- old male who developed dermatomyositis following the second dose of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine. Method(s): Case report Result: Case: We report a case of 51-year- old male who developed erythematous maculopapular rash on the upper anterior chest and upper back along with symmetric proximal muscle weakness two months after receiving his second dose of CoronaVac vaccine. His symptoms were followed by edema in the periorbital area which later involved the upper and lower extremities. He had dysphagia and weight loss. He had no known family history of autoimmune diseases. Physical examination revealed macular erythema over the lower anterior neck and upper back. Heliotrope rash and hyperkeratotic pink scaly papules on bilateral lateral second digits (mechanic's hands) were seen. Symmetric proximal muscle weakness in the upper and lower extremities was objectified. Blood tests showed elevated muscle enzymes (total CK: 3899 U/L, CK MB mass: 15.4 ng/mL, LDH: 683, AST: 232 U/L, ALT: 66 IU/L) elevated ESR (36) and normal CRP. Anti Jo 1 and anti U1 RNP were negative. Work up for systemic infection, thyroid function and malignancy were unremarkable. Diagnosis: Diagnosis of dermatomyositis was made based on clinical history and physical exam findings of symmetric proximal weakness, presence of heliotrope rash, V sign and shawl sign. Laboratory tests revealed elevated total CK, CK MB mass, LDH, AST, ALT and ESR consistent with an inflammatory myositis. Intervention(s): Hydrocortisone 1 mg/kg/day was started. Azathioprine was commenced on the 3rd hospital day. Ethical consideration: Informed consent for both written and photographic content was secured and patient confidentiality was observed. Conclusion(s): This case highlights the possible association between COVID 19 vaccine and this rare autoimmune disease. We hypothesize that among patients with genetic predisposition, the possibility of vaccines triggering and unmasking an autoimmune event is possible. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), causing high morbidity and mortality, is the hyperinflammatory response following COVID-19 infection (CI). According to the MISC management guideline, Anakinra (anti-IL1) is the preferable agent among other biologic agents: Infliximab, Tocilizumab (TCZ), and baricitinib if the patient is refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and systemic corticosteroid (CS). However, these are not available in a number of countries, including Thailand. Our case represents refractory MIS-C in a systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) patient responding well to TCZ. Method(s): Diagnostic investigations, including basic and immunological blood tests, and echocardiography assessment, were conducted. Result(s): A 12-year- old boy has been diagnosed with SJIA since he was 2 years old, according to the presentation of prolonged fever, hepatomegaly, and evanescent rash. CS, cyclosporin-a, and TCZ have been prescribed, and he has been in clinical remission off medication for two years. He experienced acute fever, rash, shortness of breath, nausea and vomiting for few days. Physical examination revealed a febrile boy with respiratory failure, compensated shock, and a generalized persistent maculopapular rash. The other was unremarkable. MIS-C was one of the possible diagnoses according to fever accompanied by more than two systems involved and his previous CI four weeks prior. Laboratory investigation revealed an elevated inflammatory response (Figure 1). The echocardiography was done by an experienced cardiologist with concern for myocardial dysfunction in MIS-C and showed a significant poor ejection fraction of the left ventricle of 42% under dobutamine, milrinone, and norepinephrine. Broad spectrum antibiotics and IVIG (1 g/kg/dose for two days) were initiated. After hemoculture did not report bacteria growth, pulse intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) 1000 mg for 3 days was given for the MIS-C treatment. After initial aggressive treatment with IVIG and pulse IVMP, the patient still has a high grade fever with laboratory revealed ongoing elevated inflammatory markers. The other possible causes of fever, such as infection and active SJIA were suspected. Immunological profiles returned with positive SAR-COV2 IgG, negative SAR-COV2 IgM, which confirmed the diagnosis of MIS-C with refractory to IVIG and CS. After multidisciplinary team discussion, TCZ was given. He had neither fever, dyspnea, nor heart failure. His clinical condition gradually improves together with laboratory parameters (Figure 1). Conclusion(s): In conclusion, our case demonstrated TCZ as a potential therapeutic agent in refractory MIS-C patients living in countries with limited access to anti-IL1 agents. The multidisciplinary care team together with prompt management is advisable to the best benefit of the patient. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background/Purpose: Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease (KFD) is a rare, self-limited histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis. Although it is of uncertain aetiology, it is associated with viral infections and autoimmune diseases. Hence, it is crucial to identify KFD from other conditions with lymphadenopathy. Here we present a case of KFD after COVID-19 infection. Method(s): Medical records were traced and reviewed Results: A previously healthy 13-year- old girl was admitted in April 2022 with four weeks of fever, dry cough, loss of weight, followed by 1 week history of painful cervical lymphadenopathy and nonspecific maculopapular rash. She received her second dose of Covid 19 vaccine in January 2022. Unfortunately, she was diagnosed with CAT II, COVID 19 infection in March 2022. There was no history of allergy, recent traveling and cat scratch injury. Clinically there was no strawberry tongue, erythema of the lips, conjunctivitis or distal extremities changes to suggest Kawasaki disease. She was initially diagnosed with infection related lymphadenitis, treated with oral azithromycin for three days and intravenous ceftriazone for one week with no improvement. Her laboratory results showed hypochromic microcystic anaemia with leucopenia, raised inflammatory markers and lactate-dehydrogenese levels. Extensive workup for infection was unremarkable. Immunology test showed ANA, ANCA, ENA were negative with normal complements. Ultrasound abdomen was normal. Excisional lymph node biopsy revealed confluent areas of necrosis surrounded by histiocytes (CD68+) with absent of neutrophils. No granuloma or atypical lymphoid cells seen. Based on histopathology report, diagnosis of KFD was established. As she was not able tolerate orally, IV hydrocortisone was started and subsequently switched to oral prednisolone. She responded well to corticosteroids with fever subsided within a day and cervical lymphadenopathy reducing in size and resolved in one month. Prednisolone was able to taper off by two months. She showed complete recovery with no recurrence during follow-up. Conclusion(s): In persistent febrile painful lymphadenopathy, excision lymph node biopsy is essential to establish definite diagnosis. This case highlights the possible association between COVID-19 and KFD.